Both the Daily Mail and the Telegraph reported on his piece. Of course, the right-wing media also seized the opportunity to amplify Atkinson’s argument against EVs. In short, the Guardian had published false and misleading information, without basic fact-checking. Shouldn't a serious newspaper scan their content for misinformation? /9rwyARAGof
#Canary mail pro vs free full
And the world is full of outspoken people with nonsensical opinions that they swear by.
Now I don't blame Rowan Atkinson that much. Hoekstra also pointed out how the Guardian’s process had failed its editorial remit: I'm not entirely convinced Atkinson is being honest here, because he is very precise in cherry picking all the anti-EV tropes, including citing an extremely conservative outlier study that and I picked apart when we did #Astongate. Notably, he highlighted that Atkinson relied on a disproven right-wing study to make his points: Q) Surely making batteries for EVs causes much higher emissions than building a std car?Ī) Yes, but the extra carbon "debt" gets paid off within 2yrs due to much lower use-phase emissions /waKUyWHIuRĮindhoven University of Technology’s Auke Hoekstra issued a scathing analysis of Atkinson’s claims. Conversely, a conventional petroleum car would continue to produce emissions after this point: In the UK in 2019, the lifetime emissions per kilometre of driving a Nissan Leaf EV were about three times lower than for the average conventional car, even before accounting for the falling carbon intensity of electricity generation during the car’s lifetime.įurthermore, Evans explained that after four years, a new EV car will have paid off its carbon debt. In particular, its research debunked Atkinson’s claim that retaining old polluting petrol engines would be better for the environment since they had “paid their environmental dues”. The thread referenced Carbon Brief’s research rebuttal to media misinformation on the life-cycle emissions of EVs versus petrol engines. Israeli soldiers shot Palestinian journalist Momen Samreen in the head while he was doing his job.The remote Scottish community of Knoydart unites to oppose construction of environmentally-damaging 4G masts.Deputy and senior policy editor for Carbon Brief Simon Evans, for example, linked to a factcheck thread he’d previously posted on EVs:
However, a number of climate, energy, and car specialists have pulled him up on his facts and sources. In it, Atkinson laid out his arguments for why the electric vehicle is not “ the environmental panacea it is claimed to be”. On 3 June, the Guardian published an opinion piece by Atkinson titled I love electric vehicles – and was an early adopter. Crucially however, he entirely missed the point about the legitimate issues with an en-masse global fleet transition to EVs. He has since been rightfully dragged on Twitter for a number of factual errors and long-debunked claims about the industry. Instead, Atkinson defended petrol cars and argued for a shift to nascent hydrogen and synthetic fuel technologies. British actor and petrolhead Rowan Atkinson penned an article for the outlet opining that he felt “duped” by the environmental call for electric vehicles (EVs). The Guardian has had a Mr Bean moment over electric cars on 3 June.
0 kommentar(er)
