If you wanna do it the RIGHT way (without getting swindled). Either they are clueless, or they are cheating people out of their money! but the companies that no nothing about digital audio and just work with soldering irons advertise them as \"fixing digital summing errors\".
Notice that the only company above that knows ANYTHING about digital audio is SPL, and they don't advertise it's use for \"fixing digital summing errors\" and crap like that. hell, if i could work a soldering iron i might be making them and selling them for god awfull high prices too. DUH! Why do they make 8 channel summing busses for this purpose instead of 2 channel (stereo)? To steal your money!!! put these two things together and it will make it sound different. I WONDER WHY! Idiots!!! When you go out of your D/A you are going through an anti-aliasing filter which rounds the high-end, then you are going through analog cabling and circutry which is adding analog harmonic distortion (NO MATTER HOW PURE THE SIGNAL PATH IS). people say it sounds better running through them. Now companys are making \"analog summing boxes\" and stealing your money. The reason this myth got started years ago is because some moron mixed in the box, and then mixed on a neve desk and found that it sounded better mixed on the desk.
Mastering wavelab vs dsp quattro code#
It all sounds the same unless their is an error in the code Why would there be erosion by means of the DAW actually writing the numbers in the form of a file ?Īnd what about the null test ?.where the original & the bounce cancel So.what's the difference between listening to the summed track & printing the summed track. Since it's all digital & hence all numbers.summing also occurs in this scenario as well, correct? The DAW is playing the track & adding in the numbers from the API & spitting out the sum, right? What about the native scenario.where I stay in the original project, route an instrument or comp set to a sub-bus, apply the plug-in to that sub-bus, routing it then back out thru the hardware mains ? At first I came to the conclusion that this made perfect sense.which it sorta' does. Then he went on to explain that I would be better off staying in SONAR, as the cumulative affect of successive DSP summing would erode the signal quality anyway.īeing a little busy of late trying to finish my CD.I just now thought seriously about this, last nite. One of the more knowledgeable members over there (who is also one of the more knowledgeable members over here), explained that most modern audio engines are about the aning there would be no benefit. I recently asked a question over in the WaveLab forum.(about mastering w/ Wavelab & UAD-1).whereby I wanted to bounce instrument & vocal stems out of SONAR as 24-Bit files & master those in WaveLab.hoping it had a better audio engine & would thereby yield a better result.
0 kommentar(er)
